Tuesday, 15 September 2026
Breaking News
NDRF TEAM PROVIDES DISASTER MANAGEMENT TRAINING TO NCC CADETS TATA HITACHI SHOWCASES NEXT-GENERATION CONSTRUCTION SOLUTIONS AT BAUMA CONEXPO INDIA 2026 CRORES ALLEGEDLY DUPED IN THE NAME OF LPNT; AROUND 150 PEOPLE CLAIM TO HAVE BEEN LURED INTO INVESTMENT SCHEME TROPHY UNVEILED FOR THE FIRST ALL INDIA GIRLS VOLLEYBALL CASH PRIZE TOURNAMENT FOR MERA HARYANA CUP JAUNDICE WREAKS HAVOC DUE TO CONTAMINATED WATER IN ABOHAR VILLAGES LAND ROW CLAIMS YOUNG MAN’S LIFE IN ZIRA VILLAGE THE ALL-OPEN LEATHER CRICKET LEAGUE STARTS WITH GRAND INAUGURATION CEREMONY IN FAZILKA VETERINARIAN MURDER: ABOHAR-GANGANAGAR HIGHWAY BLOCKED, PROTESTERS DEMAND SHO’S SUSPENSION YOU CAN RUN, BUT YOU CANNOT ESCAPE THE LAW: CM BHAGWANT SINGH MANN WARNS GANGSTERS HIDING ABROAD PUNJAB TO SCRIPT HISTORY BY HOSTING ASIAN CHAMPIONS TROPHY FOR FIRST TIME: CM BHAGWANT SINGH MANN
Sports Trending

IWF ELECTIONS: CAS UPHOLDS APPEALS FILED BY RUSSIAN WEIGHTLIFING FEDERATIONS AND OTHERS

Read in:English

LAUSANNE: The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has upheld the appeals filed by the Russian Weightlifting Federation (RWF), Maxim Agapitov, Dmitry Chernogorov and Aleksandr Kishkin (the Appellants) against the four decisions rendered on 23 May 2022 by the Eligibility Determination Panel (EDP) of the International Weightlifting Federation (IWF) (the Challenged Decisions) by which the RWF was “prohibited from nominating any candidate for election to the Executive Board, any IWF Commission and any IWF Committee for the IWF elections to be held in June 2022” and, as a consequence, the three candidates Agapitov, Chernogorov and Kishkin were declared ineligible for the same elections.

The Challenged Decisions have been set aside.The CAS Panel in charge of the matters found that the IWF EDP did not have jurisdiction to prevent the RWF from nominating candidates for the elections. Indeed, such decision is of a disciplinary nature and, as provided by Article 13 of the IWF Constitution, it was not for the IWF EDP to rule on the suspension of the RWF in the light of Article 13.12 of the IWF Constitution, but only to determine the eligibility of the candidates in accordance with the IWF Constitution.

Therefore, the CAS Panel could only set aside the Challenged Decisions and state that the ground justifying the ineligibility of the three candidates Agapitov, Chernogorov and Kishkin, proposed by the RWF for election, no longer existed.

15,596 articles
View all articles