Wednesday, 16 September 2026
Breaking News
IT IS ESSENTIAL TO EXAMINE THE ROLE OF RELIGIOUS PERCEPTIONS BEHIND THE LOW RATES OF ORGAN DONATION IN MADHYA PRADESH: DR. ATUL MALIKRAM NDRF TEAM PROVIDES DISASTER MANAGEMENT TRAINING TO NCC CADETS TATA HITACHI SHOWCASES NEXT-GENERATION CONSTRUCTION SOLUTIONS AT BAUMA CONEXPO INDIA 2026 CRORES ALLEGEDLY DUPED IN THE NAME OF LPNT; AROUND 150 PEOPLE CLAIM TO HAVE BEEN LURED INTO INVESTMENT SCHEME TROPHY UNVEILED FOR THE FIRST ALL INDIA GIRLS VOLLEYBALL CASH PRIZE TOURNAMENT FOR MERA HARYANA CUP JAUNDICE WREAKS HAVOC DUE TO CONTAMINATED WATER IN ABOHAR VILLAGES LAND ROW CLAIMS YOUNG MAN’S LIFE IN ZIRA VILLAGE THE ALL-OPEN LEATHER CRICKET LEAGUE STARTS WITH GRAND INAUGURATION CEREMONY IN FAZILKA VETERINARIAN MURDER: ABOHAR-GANGANAGAR HIGHWAY BLOCKED, PROTESTERS DEMAND SHO’S SUSPENSION YOU CAN RUN, BUT YOU CANNOT ESCAPE THE LAW: CM BHAGWANT SINGH MANN WARNS GANGSTERS HIDING ABROAD
Himachal Trending

DENIAL OF NOC HIGHLY UNJUST AND ARBITRARY : HP HIGH COURT

Read in:English

(MOREPIC1) Vijyender Sharma/Shimla

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh has found the denial of NOC and not allowing Extra Ordinary Leave to a Senior Resident Doctor to participate in the NEET Super Specialty Course counseling, by the Director Health Services, Govt. of H.P., highly unjust and arbitrary.

Justice Ranjan Sharma, passed this order on a petition filed by Dr. Anupam Sharma.

The petitioner is serving as Senior Resident (General Surgery), in the Dr. Y.S. Parmar Government Medical College, Nahan. He appeared for the NEET Super Specialty Examination 2023, conducted by the National Medical Commission and qualified the aforesaid examination.

(SUBHEAD)After qualifying the Examination the petitioner applied to the Director of Health Services for issuance of NOC and Grant of Extra Ordinary Leave, so as to enable him to pursue higher studies of NEET Super Specialty Course. The respondents neither acceded to the request of the petitioner nor conveyed a decision in this regard. The petitioner was informed verbally on 6.11.2023, that NOC cannot be issued. The petitioner was left with no other option but to approach the High Court.

The Court found that the action of the respondent in sleeping over the matter and in neither considering nor conveying any decision thereon amounts to depriving petitioner of his rights. The Court observed that the fairness demanded that the respondents should have considered the case and pass an appropriate order. The Court further observed that the action of the State authorities is not only deplorable but at the same time it has lead to arbitrariness and perversity.

The Advocate General appearing for the respondents contended that as per provisions of policies framed in this regard, no NOC is to be granted but after going through the policies, the Court found that the NOC cannot be granted for second post graduation course which is not the claim of the petitioner. The Court directed the respondents to issue NOC in favour of the petitioner forthwith and also hand over the original certificates of the petitioner, so as to enable him to participate in the Counseling.

15,596 articles
View all articles